Last night, the Moon was full (as it is every 29.5 days). It was 356,953 kilometers from Earth. Since the Moon orbits the Earth in an ellipse, it also happens to also be the closest full Moon approach of the year (called perigee). Last month's full Moon was around April 7 and it was 358,313 km away (here's an apogee and perigee calculator).
For some bizarre reason, the news media has taken to calling these events "Supermoons" and there have been a spate of "news" stories about this the past couple of days. "Supermoon" is a mostly bullshit term which I believe was first proposed by an astrologer named Richard Nolle. I say mostly bullshit because it is grounded in real astronomy (the orbit and phases of the Moon) but attributes special qualities to a Moon that's at perigee when it's full (there's the bullshit part).
I wrote about this supermoon crap in March 2011 as well.
I recently had a post on calculating the size of the Sun in the sky where I showed how to derive a formula for calculating how large an astronomical body appears in the sky. Works for the Moon as well as the Sun. The formula is:
d = 2 tan-1 [(D/2)/d]
where D is the diameter of the Moon, d is the distance from the Earth to the Moon, and delta (d) is the angular size of the Moon in the sky. The mean diameter of the Moon is 3,476 km. The distances are listed above. Let's calculate the difference in the "super" Moon's angular diameter versus last month's Moon.
d = 2 tan-1 [(D/2)/d] = 2 tan-1 [(3,476 km/2)/356,953 km] =0.558°
d = 2 tan-1 [(D/2)/d] = 2 tan-1 [(3,476 km/2)/358,313 km] = 0.556°
That's a difference of 0.4% when looking at the Moon in the night sky. Here is this difference shown to scale:
Not that I'm denigrating the Moon. I love the Moon in all its phases and am always looking up (even during the daytime) to see if I can spot it and know where it is in its cycle of phases. I always encourage people to go out and look up. But there's nothing astronomically special about this weekend's full Moon.