Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Happy Leap Day!

Today is February 29. Most of you, of course, know why there are 29 days in February every four years, right? The simple answer is because there are 365.25 days in a year so years evenly divisible by four (like 2012) are given an extra day in February. End of story? Not so fast...

As with most things in this world, the real story is a lot more complex. But in order to understand it, we have to learn a little history first (look, history and science together – that’s why college has a liberal arts curriculum boys and girls!).

Around 50 BC, the traditional calendar used in the Roman Republic was in disarray. It actually had only 355 days in a year and every 2 to 3 year, the Pontifex Maximus, a political appointee, added an extra month (called the Mensis Intercalaris) into the middle of Febrarius. Problem was, he didn’t always do it correctly so by this time the calendar was about 80 days or so off from the yearly movement of the Sun.

Into this stepped Julius Caesar.  Caesar spend time in Egypt from 48 – 47 BC where he became embroiled in the Ptolemaic dynastic war (and with Cleopatra). Caesar was an intelligent man who spent much of his time in Egypt learning about their knowledge and culture. It was there that he heard about the ancient Egyptian solar calendar of 365 days. The Egyptians actually knew the year was 365.25 days long since they had learned if from the ancient Greeks (the city of Alexandria, on the Mediterranean coast of Egypt, was a center of Greek knowledge during the Greek classical age and hosted the largest library in the ancient world).

When Julius Caesar returned to Rome, he decided to reform the calendar which everyone acknowledged was a mess. He called together a council of mathematicians and astronomers, notably Sosigenes of Alexandria, who pulled together the old Roman Calendar, the Egyptian solar calendar, and the knowledge that the tropical year was 365.25 days long (this knowledge goes all the way back to Eudoxus of Cnidus – a brilliant Greek mathematician who lived around 375 BC).

Roman historian Pliny the Elder wrote around 79 CE:

There were three main schools, the Chaldaean, the Egyptian, and the Greek; and to these a fourth was added in our country by Caesar during his dictatorship, who with the assistance of the learned astronomer Sosigenes ... brought the separate years back into conformity with the course of the sun.”

In order to align January 1, 45 BC with its correct position in his new calendar, Caesar decreed that 46 BC would be 445 days long – how far the old Roman Calendar had fallen behind the “real” date by the position of the Sun.

The Julian calendar had the following months.

   Ianuarius 31
   Febrarius 28 (29 on leap years)
   Martius 31
   Aprilis 30
   Maius 31
   Iunius 30
   Quintilis (Iulius) 31
   Sextilis (Augustus) 31
   September 30
   October 31
   November 30
   December 31

The old Roman month of Quintilis was renamed Iulius in Julius Caesar’s honor after his death in 44 BC shortly after his calendar reform (it didn’t make much sense to keep calling the seventh month “fifth”). A popular Roman senatorial decree in 8 BC also changed the name of Sextilis to Augustus after Augustus Caesar.

So by the beginning of the Christian Era, all of the months of the calendar had the names by which we know them today. Adding up the days of the month gives us 365 days in the year. By adding a leap year every 4 years, giving 366 days, the average length of the year was now 365.25 days. Since the mean solar year is slightly shorter at 365.2421897 days, this gives a difference of 0.0078103 days.

Let’s calculate how many years it will take before we have an error of 1 day:

   0.0078103 d / 1 yr = 1 d / X yr [Here’s the ratio]
   X yr = (1 d) (1 yr) / 0.0078103 d [Rearrange the terms to solve for X]
   X yr = 1 yr / 0.0078103 [Cross off day units]
   128.04 yr [Solved]

So, every 128 years, the calendar is off by one day – the date of the solstice will occur one day before the actual solstice – that’s actually a lot of error! Over time, the Julian calendar was doomed to failure for this inaccuracy.

This inaccuracy came to a head in the 1500s when church authorities finally dealt with the problem. The push to do this came from the fact that the method for computing the date of Easter uses the date of the Vernal Equinox. By the 1500s, the Julian Calendar was saying the Vernal Equinox was on March 10 instead of March 21 where it should have been and this was causing no end of confusion.

The solution to this problem was developed by Pope Gregory the XIII, with the assistance of Jesuit astronomer Christopher Clavius, by the creation of a new calendar. The Pope then issued a Papal Bull which decreed that the day after Thursday, October 4, 1582 would be not Friday, October, 5 but Friday, October 15! The loss of 10 days was necessary to align the new calendar with the actual date in the tropical year.

Pope Gregory XIII (1502-1585) and Christopher Clavius (1538-1612)

The Gregorian Calendar is now also known as the Western or Christian Calendar and is the internationally accepted civil calendar. The month names and days are familiar to all of us:

   January 31
   February 28 (29 on leap years)
   March 31
   April 30
   May 31
   June 30
   July 31
   August 31
   September 30
   October 31
   November 30
   December 31

The days of the months are remembered with the traditional rhyme:

   Thirty days hath September,
   April, June, and November;
   All the rest have thirty-one,
   Save February, with twenty-eight days clear,
   And twenty-nine each leap year.

How is this different from the Julian Calendar? What Pope Gregory did was institute another rule – years divisible by 100 would be leap years only if they were divisible by 400 as well. In other words, 1600 and 2000 were normal leap years but 1700, 1800, and 1900 were not (these would have been in the Julian Calendar). So every 400 years, you lose 3 leap year days. This gives the average length of the year as:

   400 yr x 365.25 d/yr = 146,100 d – 3 d = 146,997 d / 400 yr = 365.2425 d/yr [on average]

Compared to the tropical year value of 365.2421897 days, this gives a difference of 0.0003103 days. Let’s calculate how many years it will take before we have an error of 1 day:

   0.0003103 d / 1 yr = 1 d / X yr [Here’s the ratio]
   X yr = (1 d) (1 yr) / 0.0003103 d [Rearrange the terms to solve for X]
   X yr = 1 yr / 0.0003103 [Cross off day units]
   3222.69 yr [Solved]

In other words, the new Gregorian Calendar will lose a day every 3,223 years as opposed to the Julian Calendar error of a day every 128 years. From its institution in 1582, it will only have lost 1 day by the year 4805!

People rioted in the streets in some places over the loss of 10 days when October, 5 changed to October 15 but Catholic countries relatively quickly adopted the new calendar (the Pope still had a lot of power at that time). It took over 100 years before most of the Protestant countries in Europe abandoned the Julian Calendar. Great Britain and the American colonies didn’t switch until 1752 and in Russia, it wasn’t adopted until the Russian Revolution of 1917. One of the last major holdouts, the Eastern Orthodox Church, still uses the Julian Calendar for calculating the date of moveable feasts (church holy days that don’t fall on the same date each year).

No matter what you do, a calendar will always have some accumulating error due to the fact there are 365.2421897 days in a tropical year and, worse yet, that number is an average since the shape of the Earth’s orbit varies a bit year to year and over geologic time periods.

Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Kicking a bear in the balls

My wife just looked at me funny when I showed her this but it makes me laugh every time I see it.  No idea where it came from, unfortunately.  This guy is my hero.

Monday, February 27, 2012

Planet watching

This coming Saturday, March 3, will be a good night to go out and do some naked eye solar system astronomy (I'd say earlier in the week would be good too, but the forecast for the Hudson Valley sucks for the next few days!).


On Saturday, find somewhere you have a clear view to the west and go outside around 6:30 pm (sunset occurs at 5:49 pm EST).  High up in the southern sky will be the bright waxing gibbous Moon.  Looking toward the western horizon, you'll see superbright Venus (magnitude -4.12, the brightest thing in the sky other than the Moon), less bright (mag. -2.02), but still brighter than the brightest stars, Jupiter, and dimmer Mercury (mag. -0.58).


You can't see it, but just a couple of degrees higher and to the left of Mercury is Uranus.

Turn around and face east.  Low on the horizon is reddish Mars.


Mars will be nice and bright (mag. -1.23) because it's now at opposition - directly opposite the Earth from the Sun.  This is a once every two year or so event that leads to it being near its maximum brightness.

If you want to pop outside again after a few hours, you'll see Saturn rising in the east-southeast around 10:30 pm.


You'll have seen all five of the naked-eye planets known to the ancients in one evening (plus the Moon).  As I tell the students in my solar system astronomy class - it's a cheap Saturday night date!

Even better, Jupiter and Venus will get closer and closer together over the next few weeks and on Monday, March 12, at 8:30 pm EDT (after the time change!), you'll be able to see this spectacular sight:


By the way, the sky images here are from Stellarium, a totally free and awesome planetarium program you can download here.

Sunday, February 26, 2012

Moqui marbles

One of the things I picked up at the gem and mineral show I went to in Albany on Saturday were a couple of moqui marbles.  They are spherical to oblate (the one on the right below is sideways) concretions found primarily in Utah.


The word moqui, also commonly spelled moki or mochi, was what the Spaniards called the Hopi Indians of northern Arizona - a name which stuck until almost 1900.  Problem was, the word moqui means "the dead" in their language and was, of course, a highly insulting name (typical in European's dealings with the Native Americans).

The Navajo Sandstone is a western rock formation famous to geologists and found primarily in Arizona and Utah.  It's the remnant of a huge sand sea desert (an erg) on the western side of the supercontinent of Pangaea around 200 million years ago (early Jurassic Period).  Dinosaur trackways are found in some areas of the formation.  The coloration and weathering of the Navajo results in some spectacular scenery in northern Arizona and southern Utah as seen below.

Antelope Canyon

Paria Canyon (the "wave")

Checkerboard Mesa, Zion National Park

The Navajo Sandstone is a quartz arenite with about 90% quartz, around 5% potassium feldspar, and 5% clays and other accessory minerals.  It's very porous and permeable resulting in easy groundwater flow through the rock unit.  Concretion formation is a diagenetic processess - this refers to changes that take place before or during lithification of a sedimentary rock while it's still underground.

Here are the proposed steps in the formation of these concretions (the explanation and figures which follow are based on a paper by Chan, et al., 2005):

1.  A small number of detrital grains of iron-bearing silicate minerals (e.g pyroxenes, amphiboles, etc.) accumulated along with the quartz sand which eventually became the Navajo Sandstone.

2.  Oxygenated groundwater circulating through the sediments chemically breaks down the Fe-rich minerals and the mobilized iron (Fe3+) then forms hematite (Fe2O3) coatings around the quartz sand grains (microscope view below right).  This is what imparts the pink to orange-red color of the Navajo Sandstone.

3.  Sometime after burial and cementation of the sediments (lithification), reducing fluids (there's evidence this may be hydrocarbons like methane) from underlying strata move up through the rock heterogeneously on a mm to regional scale (in other words, in some places they do and in others they don't - fluid flow in rock is complex and controlled by differences in porosity and permeability, the orientation and density of fractures, faulting, etc.).


4.  This fluid removes the iron oxide films from the quartz grains and "bleaches" the rock from reddish to white.  The bleached rock now has pore water with reduced iron (Fe2+).


5. The Fe-rich reducing fluids eventually meet with meteoric groundwater (water derived from the surface) which is oxygenated (oxidizing).  At the boundary between the reducing and oxidizing fluids, precipitation of hematite Fe2O3 and goethite FeO(OH) occur and the concretions form (and geology students wonder why they have to take a year of college chemistry!).


6.  While commonly spherical, some of the concretions are bulbous, pipe-like, and sheet-like in various areas.  There is some evidence that much of this mineralization occurred around 25 million years ago even though the sandstone itself formed much earlier around 200 million years ago (that's not uncommon, diagenetic changes in subsurface rock can occur millions of years after the rock initially lithified).

7. More recent erosion of the sandstone has exposed bedding planes along which large quantities of these concretions (moqui marble) can weather out and be collected (I'm so jealous looking at the picture below, and filled with lust for this collecting locale but since it's now in the Grand Staircase Escalante National Monument, collecting is not allowed).


What I also find interesting is that paper by by Chan, et al., 2005 referenced about is titled Red rock and red planet diagenesis: Comparisons of Earth and Mars concretions.  Turns out the so-called "blueberries" discovered by in the Meridiani Planum region by the Mars Rover Opportunity are hematite concretions very similar in form, and possibly origin, to the moqui marbles of Utah!

Mars "blueberries - Rover view and magnified

Moqui marbles are also known as shaman stones or thunderballs.  One Hopi legend I heard was that  the departed ancestors of the Hopi played games with these "marbles" in the night when spirits are allowed to visit the earth. When the sun rises they must return to the heavens so they leave the marbles behind to let relatives know they are happy and well.

There's a lot of New Age nonsense about moqui marbles (just Google the term to see).  I'd like to see some archaeological evidence that shamans of any tribe used them (if anyone has a reference, send it to me).  By the way, I paid $5.00 at the mineral show for my two samples which are about 2 inches in diameter.  Check out what these greedy bastards are charging for them (I guess mine aren't specially "charged" with woo energy yet).