tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1644183700798263875.post7916725043026028564..comments2024-03-28T12:13:48.438-04:00Comments on Hudson Valley Geologist: Venus of Laussel - Part IStevehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14397810357022541561noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1644183700798263875.post-64469348374799049222015-09-14T17:21:21.380-04:002015-09-14T17:21:21.380-04:00Is this -amateur excavation of 1911 - was really ...Is this -amateur excavation of 1911 - was really authenticated ? . My suspicion is based on the age of this carving claimed as 25,000 years old "when people were basically hunter gatherers "meat eaters" and this lime stone carved women"so called Venus of Laussel's " Obese BODY SHAPE is more like Agricultural Era /Domestication and Sedentary life style specimen , more like 7000 BC the oldest . Basically -Starch,wheat and excessive carbohydrate consumer- Obese woman . In other words it is highly "unlikely" a Paleolithic age -meat eater- will be that much obese no matter how much meat she consumes . Metabolically not "probable even possible at all" unless she is metabolically sick woman , in other words she should be depicted as "skinny" woman as hunter gatherer and basically protein consumer . To me it is look like a "Fake" imitation of similar finds of Obese Woman of AGRICULTURAL Sedentary life style most of similar findings actually belong to 5000-3000 BC period . Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com